W-A chain. Model CPN corridor economics vs SWIFT/ACH/card for cross-border USD flows.
run_arc_fit_diagnostic{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "run_arc_fit_diagnostic",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
model_arc_cpn_economics{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "model_arc_cpn_economics",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: Finance wants the corridor's per-payment cost before we commit. What happens to the migration call once the network's per-transaction fee sits at five hundred dollars?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"arc-cpn-payment"} and read `art-43-arc-cpn-model.verdict`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-43-arc-cpn-model`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `cpn_fee_usd` set to 500. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/arc-cpn-payment.html