Model the economics of migrating cross-border USD payment flows to Circle Payments Network (CPN) vs incumbent rails — SWIFT wire, ACH, SEPA, and card. Produces per-transaction savings, annualised savings in basis points, and a CFO settlement memo. Grounded in publicly disclosed industry fee structures and Circle Arc documentation.
| Rail | Fee type | Per-tx cost (USD) | vs CPN savings | Basis points (of avg amt) |
|---|
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this exact tool, with this sample, and verify the artifact.
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `model_arc_cpn_economics`. Task: Model Circle Payments Network (CPN) corridor economics vs SWIFT, ACH, SEPA, and card rails.
Call it with arguments: {"policy_parameters":{"rail":"swift","notional_usd":10000,"monthly_volume":200,"impl_months":3}}
Verify before trusting: call `verify_execution_hash` on mcp.ainumbers.co (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with the parameter `claimed_hash` set to the returned `execution_hash`, passing the full artifact the run returned (the object containing `policy_parameters` + `output_payload` + `execution_hash`; equivalently `policy_parameters` + `output_payload` with `claimed_hash`), not the bare hash string.
Return the ledger link https://ledger.ainumbers.co/ so a human can re-verify without contacting us.
PII rule: All inputs are processed locally in your browser. No data is transmitted. Do not enter real personal data — use synthetic or anonymised inputs only.
Open the tool with the sample prefilled: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/art-43-arc-cpn-model.html#p=v1.H4sIAAAAAAAA_wFKALX_eyJyYWlsIjoic3dpZnQiLCJub3Rpb25hbF91c2QiOjEwMDAwLCJtb250aGx5X3ZvbHVtZSI6MjAwLCJpbXBsX21vbnRocyI6M31OmgGXSgAAAA