W-H convergence terminal. Merkle batch integrity over the cleared settlement set (cry-04) -> PFMI P12 DvP atomicity & CRE70 fail charge (507) -> settlement-fail-rate anomaly monitoring (ml-03).
verify_merkle_batch{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "verify_merkle_batch",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
validate_canton_dvp_atomicity{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "validate_canton_dvp_atomicity",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
detect_timeseries_anomalies{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "detect_timeseries_anomalies",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: A Canton settlement drill failed because the network kept no unwind procedure on record. What verdict does the DvP check hand back?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"treasury-clearing-settlement-integrity"} and read `507-canton-dvp-atomicity-validator.verdict`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `507-canton-dvp-atomicity-validator`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `unwind_procedure` set to false. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/treasury-clearing-settlement-integrity.html