Activity alignment (ART-73) -> entity revenue/CapEx/OpEx KPIs + Green Asset Ratio for financials (ART-74) -> audit receipt (cry-05). Rolls activity-level alignment into the entity disclosure KPIs an issuer/bank reports to investors and supervisors.
score_taxonomy_alignment{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "score_taxonomy_alignment",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
aggregate_taxonomy_kpi_gar{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "aggregate_taxonomy_kpi_gar",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
aggregate_execution_receipts{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "aggregate_execution_receipts",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: As a credit institution we owe a green asset ratio. Does the aggregator produce one from these activities?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"taxonomy-kpi"} and read `art-74-taxonomy-kpi-gar-aggregator.green_asset_ratio`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-74-taxonomy-kpi-gar-aggregator`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `entity_type` set to "credit-institution". Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/taxonomy-kpi.html