Allocation/confirmation timing + format conformance vs the 23:00 CET trade-date mandate (ART-81) -> ISO 20022 securities-settlement message linting (ART-82) -> Merkle integrity (cry-04). Covers the binding Dec-2026 same-day machine-readable requirement.
check_allocation_affirmation{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "check_allocation_affirmation",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
lint_securities_settlement_message{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "lint_securities_settlement_message",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
verify_merkle_batch{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "verify_merkle_batch",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: Cutoff is 23:00 CET from December 2026. Does an allocation confirmed at 23:40 as a PDF count as conformant?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"settlement-discipline-alloc-affirm"} and read `art-81-allocation-affirmation-conformance.on_time_rate`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-81-allocation-affirmation-conformance`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `events` changed so one allocation event confirmed at 23:40 with format pdf. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/settlement-discipline-alloc-affirm.html