Screening config conformance vs EU consolidated + UN + UK Sanctions List (post-OFSI-closure 28 Jan 2026) + OFAC SDN with nexus gating (ART-92) -> Merkle integrity (cry-04).
check_screening_list_coverage{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "check_screening_list_coverage",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
verify_merkle_batch{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "verify_merkle_batch",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: Our screener covers four lists on a weekly cycle and we on-board EU clients. Does that coverage meet the required set?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"sanctions-list-coverage"} and read `art-92-screening-list-coverage-checker.coverage_pct`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-92-screening-list-coverage-checker`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `config` changed so it screens all four required lists with weekly refresh and an EU nexus. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/sanctions-list-coverage.html