OpenChainGraph Suite · CONTRACT A3 · arch #5

eBL MLETR Conformance & Corridor Enforceability

Note (dated 2026-08-04): a chain composes independent computations performed in an analytical order. No step's output is carried into the next step by the execution model; each step computes from its own declared inputs. This is true of every chain on this site, including chains whose per-step copy below reads as a data handoff.

W-A. MLETR functional-equivalence + cross-corridor enforceability (ART-53) -> instrument/jurisdiction classification (510) -> Merkle integrity over the authoritative copy (cry-04). The flagship Wave-12 decision chain: will this electronic bill of lading hold up at both ends?

OpenChainGraph · 3 Steps cryptographic mandate Hash-Anchored §4 chain_depth:3 Client-Side · Zero PII
Chain Topology — MLETR / eBL Conformance & Enforceability Validator → Digital Asset Regulatory Classifier → Merkle Batch Verifier
§4 Execution Hash · Chain Definition Anchor
execution_hash:computing…
Chain Stages · 3 Steps
1 ROOT · D0 node
MLETR / eBL Conformance & Enforceability Validator art-53-mletr-ebl-conformance-validator
conformance_grade and enforceability_tier (H1) feed the classifier
MCP Call · validate_mletr_record
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "validate_mletr_record",
    "arguments": {}
  },
  "id": 1
}
↓
2 D2 node
Digital Asset Regulatory Classifier 510-digital-asset-regulatory-classifier
classification verdict (H2) feeds the integrity verifier
MCP Call · classify_digital_asset_regulatory
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "classify_digital_asset_regulatory",
    "arguments": {}
  },
  "id": 1
}
↓
3 TERMINAL · D3 node
Merkle Batch Verifier cry-04-merkle-batch-verifier
Exports composite enforceability artifact with execution_hash (H3), final stage
MCP Call · verify_merkle_batch
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "verify_merkle_batch",
    "arguments": {}
  },
  "id": 1
}
Export Artifacts
Download the §4 chain definition artifact (hash-anchored composite JSON) or the §13.11 W3C Verifiable Credentials view. Both derive from the chain definition — no new hash is minted. Available after hash computation.

Ask your agent

Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.

Question: We tokenise the bill of lading so title moves on a DLT rail. Which regulatory regimes pick up that asset, and where does the corridor grade stand?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"digital-trade-ebl-enforceability"} and read `510-digital-asset-regulatory-classifier.classification_results`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `510-digital-asset-regulatory-classifier`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `asset_type` set to "cbdc". Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/digital-trade-ebl-enforceability.html