Regulatory classification and Daml lifecycle validation for tokenized securities.
This page is the chain definition (plan). To run the chain step by step in your browser, with each step's kernel executing in-page and a composite hash over the outputs, open the live runner:
▶ Run this chain in your browserclassify_digital_asset_regulatory{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "classify_digital_asset_regulatory",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
validate_tokenized_security_lifecycle{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "validate_tokenized_security_lifecycle",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: A tokenized note issued on Canton carries an ISIN and a Daml lifecycle. Does the lifecycle validator clear it as compliant?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"canton-securities-issuance"} and read `512-tokenized-security-lifecycle-validator.verdict`.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/canton-securities-issuance.html