W-B chain. Quantify Herstatt risk and FX spread savings from Arc StableFX atomic PvP vs non-CLS bilateral settlement.
run_arc_fit_diagnostic{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "run_arc_fit_diagnostic",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
model_arc_stablefx_rfq{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "model_arc_stablefx_rfq",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: Our book settles dollar-yen bilaterally today. At what StableFX fee in basis points does the atomic alternative stop beating the incumbent?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"arc-stablefx"} and read `art-44-arc-stablefx-model.verdict`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-44-arc-stablefx-model`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `stablefx_fee_bps` set to 30. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/arc-stablefx.html