W-D. Agentic-AI autonomy + GPAI/systemic-risk classification (ART-67, Arts 53-55 IN FORCE 2 Aug 2025) -> agent identity & authorization (art-04) -> agent/MCP self-attestation (art-33). Governs the autonomous AI agents that transact on the Wave-14 runtime: the reflexive tie between AINumbers' agent rails and AI governance.
classify_agentic_ai_risk{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "classify_agentic_ai_risk",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
check_agent_attestation{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "check_agent_attestation",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
attest_mcp_server{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "attest_mcp_server",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: Procurement wants to swap the agent foundation model for a proprietary one. What changes in the resulting GPAI classification and obligation set?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"ai-governance-gpai-agentic"} and read `art-67-agentic-ai-risk-classifier.gpai_class`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-67-agentic-ai-risk-classifier`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `model` changed so type is proprietary, systemic_designation no. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/ai-governance-gpai-agentic.html