Single-node D0 diagnostic classifying a financial AI system's high-risk status (Annex III) and grading Article 9-15 readiness + provider/deployer split; screens in-force obligations first (Art 5, Art 4, GPAI) and routes to the right aig-* chain with a do-now vs prepare-ahead checklist.
run_ai_act_highrisk_fit{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "run_ai_act_highrisk_fit",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: Under the EU AI Act, does our credit-scoring system land in the high-risk class once its Annex III profile is declared?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"ai-governance-fit"} and read `art-64-ai-act-highrisk-fit-diagnostic.high_risk_verdict`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-64-ai-act-highrisk-fit-diagnostic`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `annex_iii_match` set to "clear-high-risk". Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/ai-governance-fit.html