Answers one question, and only that question: was this entity present in the register extract you captured, on the date you captured it? You paste the extract, name which ESMA register it came from, give the entity identifier and give the capture date. The page digests the pasted bytes exactly as pasted, searches them, and writes a single dated sentence you can quote.
A match proves a line carrying your identifier was in the text you pasted. It is not authorisation, not licensing, not registration in good standing, and not a statement about today. A no-match proves absence from that same pasted text and nothing more: a partial page, a filtered export, the wrong register, or an identifier the register spells differently would each read the same way. Nothing here proves the extract came from ESMA, was unmodified, or was captured on the date you supplied. The digest pins the bytes that were checked; it does not attest where they came from.
This page never fetches anything, ships no copy of either register, and has no clock. retrieval_date is your input because a machine clock would date the run rather than the capture, and those are different facts.
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this exact tool, with this sample, and verify the artifact.
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `check_mica_register_presence`. Task: Report whether a named entity was present in a pasted ESMA MiCA register extract as of a caller-supplied retrieval date, pinned by a SHA-256 digest of the pasted bytes.
Call it with arguments: {"policy_parameters":{"register_type":"white_paper","entity_identifier":"984500XXXXXXXXXXXX02","register_extract":"lei,issuer_name,crypto_asset_name,notification_date,home_member_state\n984500XXXXXXXXXXXX01,Example Issuer SA,EXAMPLE-EURO-TOKEN,2026-01-15,FR\n984500XXXXXXXXXXXX02,Second Issuer NV,SECOND-TOKEN,2026-02-03,NL\n984500XXXXXXXXXXXX03,Third Issuer GmbH,THIRD-TOKEN,2026-03-21,DE\n","retrieval_date":"2026-08-11","register_source_ref":"ESMA crypto-asset white paper register export (synthetic sample)","delimiter":",","header_row":true,"match_column":"lei","case_sensitive":true}}
Verify before trusting: call `verify_execution_hash` on mcp.ainumbers.co (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with the parameter `claimed_hash` set to the returned `execution_hash`, passing the full artifact the run returned (the object containing `policy_parameters` + `output_payload` + `execution_hash`; equivalently `policy_parameters` + `output_payload` with `claimed_hash`), not the bare hash string.
Return the ledger link https://ledger.ainumbers.co/ so a human can re-verify without contacting us.
PII rule: All inputs are processed locally in your browser. No data is transmitted. Do not enter real personal data โ use synthetic or anonymised inputs only.
Open the tool with the sample prefilled: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/art-602-mica-register-presence-check.html#p=v1.H4sIAAAAAAAA_wE4Asf9eyJyZWdpc3Rlcl90eXBlIjoid2hpdGVfcGFwZXIiLCJlbnRpdHlfaWRlbnRpZmllciI6Ijk4NDUwMFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWDAyIiwicmVnaXN0ZXJfZXh0cmFjdCI6ImxlaSxpc3N1ZXJfbmFtZSxjcnlwdG9fYXNzZXRfbmFtZSxub3RpZmljYXRpb25fZGF0ZSxob21lX21lbWJlcl9zdGF0ZVxuOTg0NTAwWFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYMDEsRXhhbXBsZSBJc3N1ZXIgU0EsRVhBTVBMRS1FVVJPLVRPS0VOLDIwMjYtMDEtMTUsRlJcbjk4NDUwMFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWDAyLFNlY29uZCBJc3N1ZXIgTlYsU0VDT05ELVRPS0VOLDIwMjYtMDItMDMsTkxcbjk4NDUwMFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWDAzLFRoaXJkIElzc3VlciBHbWJILFRISVJELVRPS0VOLDIwMjYtMDMtMjEsREVcbiIsInJldHJpZXZhbF9kYXRlIjoiMjAyNi0wOC0xMSIsInJlZ2lzdGVyX3NvdXJjZV9yZWYiOiJFU01BIGNyeXB0by1hc3NldCB3aGl0ZSBwYXBlciByZWdpc3RlciBleHBvcnQgKHN5bnRoZXRpYyBzYW1wbGUpIiwiZGVsaW1pdGVyIjoiLCIsImhlYWRlcl9yb3ciOnRydWUsIm1hdGNoX2NvbHVtbiI6ImxlaSIsImNhc2Vfc2Vuc2l0aXZlIjp0cnVlfULrrUA4AgAA